Login Event Calendar Careers About NACCHO Contact Us Site Map
 
Search  
Toolbox
»
»
»
»
»

Return to Toolbox Main.

Literature: Challenges,Opportunities & Strategies for Rural LHDs Seeking Accreditation

Description:

With funding from the National Network of Public Health Institutes (NNPHI) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), researchers from the NORC Walsh Center for Rural Health completed an investigation of opportunities and challenges related to public health agency accreditation among rural health departments. This resource is intended to provide additional contextual information for those already engaged in accreditation preparation efforts. 

The 4-page Policy Brief and the 59-page Full Report of the findings are included in this tool. Hard copies are available by contacting Michael Meit at meit-michael@norc.org or (301) 951-5076.

Toolkit:

Accreditation Preparation Toolkit

Keyword Area:

Accreditation, Quality Improvement, Rural

Jurisdiction:

Institutional Author:

NORC at the University of Chicago

Submitted:

08/04/2008

Modified:

06/13/2013

The NACCHO Toolbox is a repository of available resources to help local public health practitioners. Tools are produced by local, state, and federal agencies, as well as academic institutions and other stakeholders. The contents of this Toolbox are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect any official recommendations of NACCHO. NACCHO makes no express or implied warranty with respect to the contents and disclaims liability for any damages arising from or connected to the use of the material in this Toolbox.

Five most recent user comments

2.5 Stars of 5 - Somewhat Useful
Accreditation and Quality Improvement
By William Pilkington
An excellent tool for rural health departments seeking accreditation.


3.5 Stars of 5 - Useful
Rural Accreditation
By Alan Kalos
This study presents a well organized presentation of the advantages and difficulties that rural local health departments will need to consider in making a decision to seek voluntary accreditation. The small focus group approach captures an indepth analysis of the issues. However, I expect most rural public health officers are well aware of the challenges presented in this paper.